Both of these are built on the ARM’s Cortex A7 low-power design and in terms of features, there’s not a huge amount separating these two SoC CPUs.
Being designed on the same core, they both have the same amount of cache internally and the same clock speed – that will give them near-on identical performance levels. The difference comes in the graphics subsystem. Here, the A31 pulls ahead with its dual-core SGX544 graphics setup. As best as we can figure, the MT6589 only features a single SGX544 core. For gaming, that’d put the A31 easily in front.
However, the Allwinner A31 vs MediaTek MT6589 battle isn’t that cut-and-dried. The Allwinner A31 is manufactured on a 40-nanometre scale whereas the MT6589 uses a more efficient 28nm scale – that means the MT6589 should not only run cooler than the A31, it should have better battery life. A result of using smaller-scale production is lower power consumption, which directly relates to better battery life in portable devices.
So putting it into perspective, the A31 is the choice if you want performance, particularly on games and graphics-intensive apps but for battery life, we’d for the MediaTek MT6589 with its 28-nanometre production.
|CPU||Allwinner A31||MediaTek MT6589|
|Family Architecture||ARM Cortex A7||ARM Cortex A7|
|No of cores||4||4|
|GPU||PowerVR SGX544 MP2||PowerVR SGX544|
Try these similar stories:
- CPUs compared – Rockchip RK3188 vs MediaTek MT6589
- Dual-core ARM battle: RockChip’s RK3168 vs Allwinner’s A20
- How they compare – Rockchip RK3188 vs Freescale i.MX 6
- How they compare: Rockchip RK3188 vs Allwinner A31
- MediaTek MT6592 delivers eight-cores by month’s end
- How they compare – Rockchip RK3066 vs Allwinner A20
- CPU differences – Rockchip RK3066 vs RK3168
- Huawei to launch 8-core K3V3 CPU later this year
- [CPU specs] Rockchip RK3188
- Better gaming CPU – Rockchip RK3188 or Allwinner A31